CLASS ACTION BOUNTY HUNTERS

Spread the love

 

Please post & distribute.

MNN. 30 May 2019. Scalping natives is lucrative. Lawyers are getting filthy rich hunting down native victims from Canada’s numerous genocide programs. Different compensation is offered for deliberately maiming different parts of our minds, bodies and energy. A paltry $10,000 and “sorry” for beating up, strapping little kids, more for knocking us out, lifelong impairment, hospitalization, emotional and mental abuse, raping, impregnation, sterilization, loss of language, culture and self-esteem, scientific experimentation and death.

A letter was sent to the Complaints & Compliance of the Law Society of Ontario on one of their leading “Injun scouts” Gowling WLG. lawsociety@lso.ca. about the INDIAN DAY SCHOOL LITIGATION cash cow that Canada has set up for their Indian bounty hunters. Canada is paying Gowling WLG to erase this abuse from their history. 

Gowling WLG [Canada] LLP are the lawyers representing the Plaintiffs in the Indian Day Class Action suit against the government of Canada [Gary Leslie McLean and others v. Her Majesty the Queen (T-2169-16), Federal Court Winnipeg).

Gowling WLG violated the following Rules of Professional Conduct mandated by all law societies.   

[3.4-1.] A lawyer cannot act for a client where there is a conflict of interest. [Rule 1.1-1] A conflict of interest is when the lawyer’s loyalty to a client is “adversely affected by the lawyer’s own interest or lawyer’s duties to another client, especially a financial interest”.   

Gowling WLG has an enormous financial interest in settling this case, which is an outrageous attorney fee of $55,000,000 that was secretly negotiated with our opponents Canada. They are seeking approval by the federal court of Canada.  

Legally attorney fees are negotiated and paid by the Plaintiffs to the lawyers, not by the opponents, Canada. The guilty party has become a party. Gowling WLG is negotiating payment to themselves from our opponents. Gowling WLG is trying to settle the agreement that is favourable to Canada [similar to bribery] rather than to the clients. Gowling WLG foregoes its fiduciary duty to its clients to act only in our best interests.

THAT’S WHAT YOU THINK!

Clients were forced to sign “Objection Forms” to the proposed settlement agreement. Gowling WLG pitted their clients, the plaintiff “supporters” and the plaintiff “objectors” against each other.  

Gowling WLG then responded to the objectors at the hearing in Winnipeg by informing the Court that we were wrong in our objections and that the Court should disregard our testimony. This is conflict of interest. At the same time Gowling WLG supported our opponents, Canada.  

The Day School victims are one people who all suffered the same painful cultural genocide. Another conflict of interest is the assertion of 5 different levels of compensation for damages, ranging from $10,000 up to $200,000 under Canada’s control.  

Gowling WLG refused to communicate with the objectors. One client traveled 3 days with their family by car to Winnipeg. Gowling WLG allowed them to speak for 3 minutes. Gowlings WLG treated objectors despicably because they might jeopardized the $55,000,000 attorney fee they are seeking.  

[Joint Retainers 3.4-5]. A lawyer cannot act for more than one client. If a conflict develops that cannot be resolved, the lawyer cannot continue to act for both or all of them and may have to withdraw immediately.   

Gowling WLG represents its clients. Not our opponents Canada. They need our consent in the matter.  Canada admitted its guilt and liability in 2009 when the case was filed by the original plaintiffs. Gowling WLG took over in 2016 and had nothing to do with its resolution! Canada must pay the victims directly for its crimes. The plaintiffs then pay their lawyers out of the settlement proceeds.  

Settlement and attorney fees are separate. Gowling WLG lost its objectivity when our opponents Canada volunteered to pay its legal fees. The clients were never consulted on this agreement between Gowling WLG and the original plaintiffs. From then on, Gowling WLG was against any plaintiffs objecting to this shady settlement.  

Some clients want to meet with the Law Society to discuss the practice of lawyers collecting and bringing in our severed heads to line their pockets.  

We can never win in their private Admiralty court system. The only true venue we should be in is the International Court of Arbitration in the Hague. We think the lawyers at Gowling WLG are probably singing this song as they rub their hands together about the $55 million:

  MNN P.O.Box 991, kahnawake [Quebec Canada] J0L 1B0 kahentinetha2@protonmail.com

GOWLING WLG IS IN CONFLICT IN ALGONQUIN CLAIM FOR KANIENHAKA LAND: https://www.canada.ca/en/news/archive/2011/06/ron-doering-appointed-chief-federal-negotiator-algonquins-ontario-land-claim-talks.html  and https://gowlingwlg.com/en/people/ronald-doering/#panel-button1

AOO OPPOSED BY ALL KANIENKEHAKA COMMUNITIES https://tworowtimes.com/news/iroquois-caucus-opposes-modern-treaty-sought-algonquins-onta/

EVERYONE IS WELCOME. UPDATES WILL BE POSTED.  

DECLINE OF THE MOVEMENT OF THE YELLOW VEST

https://mail.protonmail.com/inbox/l9BWBaIxmlZcbkLJGBYfSGIp3Ky_D1tqeCxsewk-7FtYKobyJTkKCxGBxzknvj2HRQtIOZqRzprffdxvIY817g==

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *