Please post and distribute.
MNN. July 23, 2014. In the early 1970s the Mohawks of Kahnawake were building a traditional school in the back of the community. Money ran out. The longhouse decided to send a few people to Indian Affairs in Ottawa to collect some of our Indian Trust Fund.
The Mohawks arrived at Indian Affairs and said, âOur people sent us to get our fundsâ. They were refused. Our representatives said they would be back in one week for it.
The following week the Mohawks arrived with reinforcements. Indian Affairs was waiting for them. An employee told them the police were on their way to evict them. Our representatives prepared for the encounter. Tables and chairs were turned and implements were grabbled. The police arrived, took a look and left.
Minister of Indian Affairs, Jean Chretien, sent his Indian aide to tell our representatives, âThis is not how things are doneâ. He was told, âOur people sent us. Weâre staying until we get our peopleâs money!â. The aide talked them into leaving the meeting room and staying at the Skyline Hotel. A few days later a check arrived that covered most of the expenses for the new school.
We knew that every cent of revenue that went into this fund comes from the extraction of our stolen resources. They were supposed to place half of everything [Two Row Wampum] theyâve ever done on our land with our resources in an account for us. The crown [the shareholders of the Corporation of Canada] took 100% and put it all into their Consolidated Revenue Fund without our knowledge or consent. With the illegal colonial Indian Act, they made themselves our trustees over all of our funds, lands and resources. Canada like all corporations is designed to provide maximum profit to its shareholders. The corporation is run on our Indian Trust Fund. All extra monies is treated as profits and distributed to the shareholders as dividends.
As Pink Floyd says, âMoney, get away. Get a good job with more pay and youâre O.K. Money, itâs a gas. Grab that cash with both hands. Make a stash.â Pink Floyd. âMoneyâ.
CANADA IS NOTHING MORE THAN A DEAD CORPORATION. Dean Kory, a Canadian from Lindsay wrote the following on Facebook. We think heâs hit the nail on the head. Canada is created on lies, deceit, theft and the fact alleged Canadianâs DO believe in the impossible. This is an essay detailing âThe Truth about Non-Canada!â or, if you prefer you could say it reveals,âThe Myth of Canada!â, Or it could be the story of âCanada: the Non-Country!â
When we refer to our curÂrent alleged CanaÂdian govÂernÂment as de jure, we no doubt mean de facto, since de facto means âin factâ, but not âby lawâ, which is what de jure means. In other words, a lawÂful govÂernÂment is a de jure government.
A govÂernÂment that exists by decepÂtion and fraud, and not by lawÂful authorÂity, is a de facto government.
Itâs highly unlikely that the CanaÂdian estabÂlishÂment, with politÂiÂcal milÂlionÂaire shysÂters as its vanÂguard, is ignoÂrant of the actual hisÂtory of Canada and its fake govÂernÂment. The fake verÂsion taught in our schools has nothÂing in comÂmon with 135 years of realÂity; of govÂernÂment by milÂlionÂaires, of milÂlionÂaires, for millionaires.
Canada is neiÂther a fedÂerÂaÂtion nor does its govÂernÂment operÂate with legitÂiÂmate authorÂity. KnowÂing this and keepÂing mum about it makes politiÂcians and the entire Bar AssoÂciÂaÂtion crimÂiÂnal offendÂers by default, if not by designâŚall of them, past and present. Which doesnât matÂter much these days because itâs obviÂously cool (and very profÂitable) to be lawÂless, as far as those at the trough are concerned.
JudgÂing by politiÂcians, and the legal communityâs visÂiÂble conÂduct, their stratÂegy seems to be one of perÂpetÂuÂally reinÂforcÂing the nixÂing of the UNAUTHORIZED AND ILLEGITIMATE EXISTENCE OF CANADIAN GOVERNMENTS by teaching and celÂeÂbratÂing a CanaÂdiÂana, pickÂled in bald-faced lies, with much ado and hoopla.
researchers have accuÂrately re-created a chronolÂogy of what actuÂally hapÂpened since 1864 and what Canadaâs staÂtus is todayâŚwhich isnât news, itâs just inforÂmaÂtion that is rigÂorÂously suppressed.
It takes a lot of time and effort to sepÂaÂrate the facts from the myths about Canadaâs âcreÂation.â ForÂtuÂnately, there have been many dedÂiÂcated CanaÂdiÂans doing the arduÂous research. By learnÂing how conÂstiÂtuÂtions and nations are propÂerly creÂated and then comÂparÂing this with Canadaâs (and Britainâs) records of the time (and since then), these researchers have accuÂrately re-created a chronolÂogy of what actuÂally hapÂpened since 1864 and what Canadaâs staÂtus is todayâŚwhich isnât news, itâs just inforÂmaÂtion that is rigÂorÂously suppressed.
Few peoÂple would susÂpect that eduÂcaÂtional facÂulÂties, politiÂcians, judges, media and the entire memÂberÂship of the CanaÂdian Bar AssoÂciÂaÂtion would intenÂtionÂally deny the exisÂtence of such a funÂdaÂmenÂtally imporÂtant matÂter. With few notable excepÂtions, the pubÂlic has unquesÂtionÂingly accepted the offiÂcial fairyÂtale as gospel. ProÂfesÂsionÂals, privy to the truth, are simÂply too busy chasÂing the buck and drop the truth from their conscience.
PolitiÂcians have banked on such develÂopÂments with astonÂishÂing sucÂcess since âconÂfedÂerÂaÂtion.â Today, nobody in his right mind (while ignoÂrant of the facts) will believe that Canada has actuÂally been under the conÂtrol of imposÂtors for 135 years; which conÂtinÂues to be so, as long as most CanaÂdiÂans are conÂtent to trudge through the dark, thinkÂing they are soarÂing in the light.
Nowhere are the conÂseÂquences of this masÂsive decepÂtion more embodÂied than in the diliÂgence with which CanaÂdian judges help the CanaÂdian CusÂtoms and RevÂenue Agency ( CCRA ) to ruthÂlessly adminÂisÂter a tax extracÂtion racket as fraudÂuÂlent and crimÂiÂnal as Canadaâs C-36 proÂtecÂtion racket. Faced with havÂing to rule inescapably in favour of the aggrieved (tax vicÂtims) CanaÂdian judges, spineÂless withÂout excepÂtion, have turned into legal eels, symÂbiÂotÂiÂcally corÂrupted by their addicÂtion to presÂtige, speÂcial privÂiÂleges and highly salaried appointÂments for life.
CitÂiÂzens, pay for judiÂcial privÂiÂleges with the eroÂsion of their âconÂstiÂtuÂtionalâ rights and speedy redress, while judges hide their botÂtomÂless cowÂardice to uphold the prinÂciÂples of the BNA Act behind overÂbearÂing pomÂposÂity, intimÂiÂdaÂtion and self-serving and crimÂiÂnal bias, in an effort to proÂtect the hand that feeds them.
There is no such thing as arms length freeÂdom of judges from govÂernÂment interÂferÂence. When it comes to the conÂstiÂtuÂtion and taxes, judges are deathly afraid to reveal their knowlÂedge of the BNA Actâs illeÂgitÂiÂmacy. Instead they improÂvise slick Catch 22 proÂceÂdures and set obstrucÂtive preceÂdents based on legal sophistry; ostenÂsiÂbly, to âavoid the chaosâ that would ensue if they were inclined to respect the (non-) conÂstiÂtuÂtional rights of the peoÂple. They mainÂtain that, by enlightÂenÂing the pubÂlic about Canadaâs conÂstiÂtuÂtional realÂity and by rulÂing fairly and with integrity, they would âunleashâ real nation buildÂing reforms by a libÂerÂated pubÂlic, while curÂtailÂing for themÂselves Ottawaâs munifÂiÂcence, which they view as anarchy.
ComÂpoundÂing their crimes, judges find nothÂing wrong with the masÂsive counÂterÂfeitÂing of credit and the colÂlecÂtion of interÂest from it by priÂvate banks. Nor does it bother them that this occurs withÂout the blessÂings of the BNA Act and under the ausÂpices of imposÂtors with preÂtenÂsions of govÂernÂmenÂtal authorityâŚall of which has become ârealâ under the umbrella of fake legitimacy.
Canada is joined in this conÂstiÂtuÂtional dilemma by AusÂtralia and New Zealand. But, unlike Canadaâs, their legal comÂmuÂniÂties have acknowlÂedged that a conÂstiÂtuÂtional probÂlem exists and they deal with it, viewÂing it as a grand opporÂtuÂnity of change for the better.
To underÂstand why the BNA Act and the CanaÂdian FedÂerÂaÂtion are fake, here is a quick, nutÂshell explaÂnaÂtion of how and by whom conÂstiÂtuÂtions and sovÂerÂeign demoÂcÂraÂtic counÂtries are propÂerly created.
The âinfaÂmous socialÂist agendaâ The creÂation of a demoÂcÂraÂtic nation is for sane peoÂple simÂply a matÂter of comÂmon sense and decency; for the estabÂlished elites itâs a leadÂing cause of apoplexy and a matÂter of subÂverÂsion, terÂrorÂism and communismâŚif not downÂright anarchy.
But assumÂing that a sovÂerÂeign demoÂcÂraÂtic fedÂerÂaÂtion is socially desirÂable â in other words, libÂeral rhetoric transÂformed into actual realÂity â no superÂnatÂural abilÂiÂties or speÂcial law degrees are necÂesÂsary to creÂate it.
It requires merely a pubÂlic conÂsenÂsus about the purÂpose of the nation and how to best achieve it.
a) First, there has to be a terÂriÂtory (like a CanaÂdian province) whoâs peoÂple desire to be a sovÂerÂeign and demoÂcÂraÂtic nation.
b) From among themÂselves the peoÂple select, by vote or appointÂment, a temÂpoÂrary assemÂbly and charge it with the forÂmuÂlaÂtion of a conÂstiÂtuÂtion.
c) A first draft of the conÂstiÂtuÂtion is subÂmitÂted by the assemÂbly to the peoÂple for review and pubÂlic debate, to proÂvide an opporÂtuÂnity for changes.
d) After a first pubÂlic debate the assemÂbly retires to work out the changes, after which it is subÂmitÂted again to the peoÂple for review and furÂther changes, if necÂesÂsary.
e) This process is repeated until the conÂstiÂtuÂtion has become a forÂmula acceptÂable to a subÂstanÂtial majorÂity of the peoÂple.
f) Now the peoÂple vote in a refÂerÂenÂdum to accept (or reject) the conÂstiÂtuÂtion with a pre-determined majorÂity (75% for examÂple).
g) If the required majorÂity canÂnot be achieved, furÂther changes must be made until the forÂmula becomes acceptÂable to the required numÂber of peoÂple.
h) The entire process is recorded and docÂuÂmented as proof of the constitutionâs authorÂity.
i) On the basis of the conÂstiÂtuÂtion a govÂernÂment is then formed, which is conÂtracÂtuÂally bound (social conÂtract) to respect it and conÂduct itself in accord with it.
j) Now this sovÂerÂeign nation can form a fedÂerÂaÂtion with other nations, if it wishes to do so.
Note, that no conÂsidÂerÂaÂtion has been given to the manipÂuÂlaÂtive interÂferÂence from priÂvately owned media monopolies.
Note, that the conÂstiÂtuÂtion is creÂated first, then the govÂernÂment. To creÂate a demoÂcÂraÂtic nation for the peoÂple, by the peoÂple, of the peoÂple, it canÂnot be any other way.
Note, no forÂeign govÂernÂment can forÂmuÂlate (or creÂate) the conÂstiÂtuÂtion of another counÂtry. It has to be creÂated by the peoÂple themÂselves and becomes thus, for all intents and purÂposes, their proÂtecÂtive propÂerty. Itâs not only the law but is a conÂtract which subÂjuÂgates the govÂernÂment to the peoÂple. The govÂernÂment derives a limÂited authorÂity to govÂern from it, always subÂject to the peopleâs authority.
Note, ONLY SOVEREIGN NATIONS CAN FORM A FEDERATION. For examÂple, a dominÂion is the subÂject of an empire, un-free, and canÂnot deterÂmine anyÂthing, much less fedÂerÂate, withÂout the empireâs approval. A SOVEREIGN NATION IS NOT SUBJECT TO ANYONE . In other words, it is free to design its socio-economic orgaÂniÂzaÂtion or enter into fedÂerÂaÂtions in any way it wants.
A sovÂerÂeign, demoÂcÂraÂtic dominÂion?! But thatâs not what hapÂpened in 1867. When we ask, did Canada become then a sovÂerÂeign, demoÂcÂraÂtic dominÂion, we must also ask, of whom or of what? The Crown? RothÂschild? The IMF ? Thus the inconÂgruity becomes unmisÂtakÂably self-evident.
In 1867 we-the-people didnât exist, as far as politÂiÂcal âparÂticÂiÂpaÂtionâ was conÂcerned. In the exalted view of our betÂters, the coloÂnial milÂlionÂaire paragons of civÂiÂlizaÂtion, we were pracÂtiÂcally indisÂtinÂguishÂable from the stinkÂing squalor surÂroundÂing us. They habitÂuÂally referred to us as âscum.â They were the landed genÂtry, lordÂing it over us, the rabÂble, with style, opulenceâŚand vastly refined superiority.
In 1864 an assemÂbly of such unelected âcoloÂnial repÂreÂsenÂtaÂtives of the Crownâ (appointees and careerists) conÂvened in QueÂbec and began to draft the QueÂbec ResÂoÂluÂtions under the wise guidÂance of the Hon. John A. MacÂdonÂald, all of them men of subÂstance, inspired by self-interest. The genÂeral âscumâ of the day didnât even know that this was going on, not being wealthy enough to vote and all.âŚ
Note, that the origÂiÂnal draft was creÂated by an unelected assemÂbly of coloÂnial appointees withÂout the knowlÂedge of the genÂeral pubÂlic. In 1867 the âQueÂbec scheme of 1864âł was subÂmitÂted to the ColoÂnial Office in LonÂdon for Royal assent, to be enacted by the British legÂisÂlaÂture. In between readÂings in the House of Lords and the House of ComÂmons the wordÂing of the preÂamÂble (the most imporÂtant page of a conÂstiÂtuÂtion) was changed (a fraudÂuÂlent slight of hand), withÂout the knowlÂedge of the delÂeÂgaÂtion from Canada or anyÂbody in both houses, into the oxyÂmoron it has remained to this day. At this point there existed no printed copy of the original.
RememÂber, no forÂeign govÂernÂment can creÂate a legally valid conÂstiÂtuÂtion for another counÂtry. What evenÂtuÂally emerged from the British legÂisÂlaÂture was a statute as phoney as a three dolÂlar bill, with the first page missÂing entirely. The list of experts who attested to this fact in 1935 is impresÂsive, indeed:
Dr. O. D. SkelÂton, Under-Secretary of State for ExterÂnal Affairs; Dr. Ollivier, K.C., Joint-Law Clerk, House of ComÂmons; Dr. W. P. Kennedy, ProÂfesÂsor of Law, UniÂverÂsity of Toronto; Dr. N. McL. Rogers, ProÂfesÂsor of PolitÂiÂcal SciÂence, Queens UniÂverÂsity; Dr. Arthur BeauchÂesne, K.C., C.M.G., L.L.D., Clerk of the House of Commons.
And it doesnât end there. Note, that there exists no docÂuÂmented record of a manÂdated assemÂbly or debates by neiÂther the elites nor the âscum,â nor a bindÂing refÂerÂenÂdum in 1867 or since.
On NovemÂber 8, 1945, the MP for Jasper-Edson, WalÂter F. Kuhl, widely respected as the pre-eminent authorÂity on conÂstiÂtuÂtional matÂters at the time, tried to revive the issue of Canadaâs non-constitution/non-federation in the House. He stressed that UNTIL 1931 CANADA WAS NOT , AND COULDN âT HAVE BEEN , A FEDERATION since, until then, it was still a dominÂion of the crown.
Only in 1931 did the British Crown abroÂgate its authorÂity over the CanaÂdian DominÂions (provinces) with the enactÂment of the Statute of WestÂminÂster. This proÂvided a most ausÂpiÂcious opporÂtuÂnity for Canada to become a truly sovÂerÂeign, demoÂcÂraÂtic fedÂerÂaÂtion. Instead Ottawa creÂated the Bank of Canada, a cenÂtral bank.
Once again the ĂŠlite stuÂdiously âignoredâ the opporÂtuÂnity Mr. Kuhlâs arguÂment offered to creÂate a bona fide fedÂerÂaÂtion based on a bona fide conÂstiÂtuÂtion. It creÂated the Maple Leaf Flag instead; more focussed on image than on subÂstance in order to mainÂtain the delibÂerÂate decepÂtion. There exists no record of any conÂstiÂtuÂtional assemÂbly, any pubÂlic debates or any conÂstiÂtuÂtional refÂerÂenÂdum nor any conÂfedÂerÂaÂtion efforts since 1931, other than Ottawaâs denial of Quebecâs sovÂerÂeignty, which is a fact.
under the conÂtrol of pirates who gut and plunÂder it to their heartsâ conÂtent.
Since 1931 the rest of Canada has been akin to a wreck, loaded to the hilt with gold, adrift at sea, under the conÂtrol of pirates who gut and plunÂder it to their heartsâ conÂtent. There are even rumours, that the RothÂschild Clan secretly claimed Canada as an object of salÂvage and is manÂagÂing it and extractÂing its wealth from behind comÂplex fronts within fronts, like a RussÂian Egg, with the outer, visÂiÂble shell being the âfedÂeral government.â
But, peoÂple ask, didnât Trudeau âpatriÂateâ the conÂstiÂtuÂtion and the CharÂter of Rights and FreeÂdoms in 1982? Well, he actuÂally did patriÂate, in a fashionâŚand a uniÂfied choÂrus of the pubÂlic, the media, the judiÂciary and eduÂcaÂtional instiÂtuÂtions all went âAahhâ and âOohhâ and âisnât that nice of him?â It seemÂingly never dawned on anyÂbody to ask who gave him the authorÂity to draft the CharÂter of Rights and Freedoms.
Letâs give it the benÂeÂfit of the doubt and assume that it is a semanÂtic misÂtake, and what was meant was that Trudeau repaÂtriÂated the conÂstiÂtuÂtion. That would mean he brought it home in 1982. We must ask then, from where?! Where was it until 1982 if not in this âsovÂerÂeign, demoÂcÂraÂtic and fedÂerÂated dominÂion?â In Britain? The probÂlem here, is the word âpatriÂate.â It didnât exist in the EngÂlish lanÂguage until 1981, nor does it exist in any other lanÂguage, ancient or conÂtemÂpoÂrary, to this day. It is meanÂingÂless gibÂberÂish invented by Trudeau and his cabÂiÂnet. The quesÂtion âWhat does it mean?â is unanÂswerÂable. PerÂhaps it was intended to be rooted in the Latin word patris. Which could mean, by a wild stretch of the imagÂiÂnaÂtion, that Father Pierre fathered the Bill of Rights and FreeÂdoms and genÂerÂously bestowed it upon CanaÂdiÂans as an (unconÂstiÂtuÂtional) gift. More likely, the word simÂply exists to invoke a sense of conÂstiÂtuÂtional incomÂpreÂhenÂsion in order to disÂcourÂage deeper probÂings by a mysÂtiÂfied public.
Why? In comÂparÂiÂson with the proper process explained above, itâs pracÂtiÂcally imposÂsiÂble to believe that Canada is a legitÂiÂmately sovÂerÂeign and demoÂcÂraÂtic fedÂerÂaÂtion, unless one is deranged or in the grasp of opiÂate dreams. Since most CanaÂdiÂans DO believe the imposÂsiÂble, what does this say about their menÂtal and moral disposition?
No matÂter how we slice it the CanaÂdian FedÂerÂaÂtion remains a ficÂtion. The fedÂeral govÂernÂment is a cabal of imposÂtors; its authorÂity to govÂern being non-existent until such time as CanaÂdiÂans wake up to the fact that EVERY TREATY ENTERED INTO ( NATO , GATS , NAFTA , FTA , FTAA etc.) AND ALL LAWS AND REGULATIONS ( ITA , GST , C36 , PRIVATIZATION , DOWNSIZING , etc.) PASSED SINCE 1867 ARE NULL AND VOID âŚjust as null and void as the non-constitutional authorÂity of Canadaâs comÂmuÂnity of botÂtom feedersâŚthe judiÂciary and the CanaÂdian Bar AssoÂciÂaÂtion, includÂing their bloated and subÂverÂsive court procedures.
And letâs not forÂget the law enforceÂment agenÂcies such as the RCMP , the police and CSIS , which have no non-constitutional authorÂity to enforce (or proÂtect) anyÂthing, much less the dicÂtates (legalÂized crime) of impostors.
GOVERNMENT IS NOT THE BOSS , YOU ARE! SO ACT LIKE ONE! KnowÂing all this, perÂhaps it becomes a bit more attracÂtive for CanaÂdiÂans to get a taste of real nationÂhood and real sovÂerÂeignty (i.e. freeÂdom), instead of oppresÂsive despoÂtism and wage slavÂery, by adoptÂing the purely CanaÂdian conÂcept of PARTICIPATION .
To sum it up, CANADA IS A GIGANTIC FAKE , an embarÂrassÂment of giant proÂporÂtions. All cenÂtralÂized govÂernÂments are imposed by non-legal force and their conÂstiÂtuÂtions are not worth the paper they are writÂten on, nor are their laws, as we can clearly see now. It will stay that way until such a time when nation buildÂing is again conÂsidÂered a project worÂthy of the creÂative and libÂerÂatÂing efforts of free peopleâŚinclusive, conÂsenÂsual, uniÂverÂsal and truly democratic.
As it stands now, Canada is a fake in every respect, in the hands of despotic indiÂvidÂuÂals bent on pulling off the biggest crime in the universe⌠THE GLOBALIZATION OF FAKENESS âŚand again the establishmentâs cheerÂleadÂers go âOohhâ and âAahh,â duly recorded and endÂlessly re-cycled in the closed loop of the media monopÂoÂlies until all alterÂnaÂtives have moved beyond the vanÂishÂing pointâŚout of sight.
Oh, and what was that you were sayÂing about fightÂing your tax assessÂment (or this or that alleged law) on grounds that it is unconÂstiÂtuÂtional? PerÂhaps you should conÂsider movÂing to a real CounÂtry, or at least one that has a real constitution!
We, as alleged CanaÂdiÂans are livÂing in an un-country with no law because we have no basis from which to frame any law, hence we have absolutely no funÂdaÂmenÂtal rights, real or feigned! EveryÂthing is merely an âactâ (no pun intended) designed to keep us un-informed, un-protected, and un-able to object.
MNN Mohawk Nation News kahentinetha2@yahoo.com For more news, books, workshops, to donate and sign up for MNN newsletters, go to www.mohawknationnews.com More stories at MNN Archives. Address: Box 991, Kahnawake [Quebec, Canada] J0L thahoketoteh@hotmail.comfor original Mohawk music visit thahoketoteh.ws